Then she said to Moses, “You are a bridegroom of blood to me.” 26 Zipporah said this because she had to circumcise … 25 Then Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son’s foreskin, and touched Moses’ feet {with it}. The immediate question is, "Why is Moses not performing the circumcision?" Obviously Moses’ neglect regarding his own son was inexcusable and compromised the validity of God’s full message to humanity. Scripture says that she then takes their son's foreskin and touches Moses' feet with it. So Zipporah immediately circumcised their son and saved Moses’ life (Exodus 4:24–26). Many translations (even some KJV editions) begin a new section after verse 23 (often with a new section heading), obscuring the fact that "him" in verse 24 refers to Pharaoh's firstborn son mentioned in verse 23. However, this question cannot be answered without discovering who she was trying to save: Moses or Gershom, her son. Then Zipporah said, “Yes, my dear, you are safe because of this circumcision. Looks like Moses was at deaths door. Zipporah's complaint appears to pertain to something Moses failed to do. God must have brought it to their attention because Zipporah took action to circumcise her son; the point being how else would she have known that circumcision of the son was the exact thing that would save Moses’ life. The Lord met Moses at that place and tried to kill him. It was because of the circumcision that she said at … Could it have been that Moses compromised his obedience  for Zipporahs sake in not carrying out the commandment to circumcise all the sons of Abraham. The underlined words above are words that were supplied by the NIV translators. Zipporah quickly circumcised her son with a sharp stone and touched Moses' feet with the foreskin, saying "Surely you are a husband of blood to me!" The term "bloody husband" is merely Zipporah's criticism of a husband who performs an apparently strange and bloody procedure. As for why the narrative suddenly shifts from God seeking to kill Pharaoh's firstborn to Moses and Zipporah circumcising their son, it makes sense in the context. Many non-Hebrews who have never seen circumcision might find the procedure utterly strange, inhumane, and disgusting. But God did not. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. One has to be grafted into one of these two. God had the foreknowledge of Pharaoh's refusal to let Israel go, so God was already prepared to seek the death of the firstborn son. The custom was, if the husband dies the wife can circumcise the son. 26 So the Lord let him alone. There is no need to ask these difficult questions. These supplied names seem to make it easier for the reader to follow the narrative. “Now Jethro, the priest of Midian and father-in-law of Moses, heard of everything God had done for Moses and for his people Israel, and how the LORD had brought Israel out of Egypt. The question remains: why did Moses resist such a clear command of God and did not circumcise his son? Upon rejoining Moses at Mt. Why did Zipporah circumcise her son rather than letting Moses do it? The boy should have been circumcised on the eighth day by Jethro, to whose household the child belonged according to the marriage and ascendancy pattern of Abraham's Horite Hebrew people. Through the blood of her son she renewed her marriage vow to Moses and saved him from God’s wrath. This was a valid concern. Zipporah, Moses’ wife, saw what was happening and took the initiative to remove the uninvited guest on the journey, this un-corrected sin. Possibly Moses suffered an illness or seizure. Had Zipporah changed her belief and not wanted circumcision. Punishment for failing to be circumcis. In the Talmud (TB Nedarim 32a), R. Yose explains that Moses delayed circumcising his youngest son, because doing so would force him to postpone his mission to Egypt by three days while the baby recovered. The Circumcision of son of Moses, Jan Baptist Weenix ca 1640. So Moses would have been circumcised by eight days old. Circumcision represents disobedience to the Torah(law). Report Abuse|Print Page|Powered By Google Sites. While on the way the Lord "met [Moses] and sought to put him to death" (Exodus 4:24). This passage is rather uneventful and straightforward if we read it properly. This was a valid concern. God then left Moses alone (Exodus 4:24-26). Zipporah saves Moses’ life by an emergency circumcision of one of her sons (Exodus 4:24, 26). The problem is not with the answers, but with the questions. the LORD sought to kill “him”—either Moses or his son, but Zipporah circumcised her son and the LORD withdrew from “him.” Not only does Exodus 4 parallel Jacob’s journey home told in Genesis 32, it links Zipporah to other preserving, delivering women in the lives of the ancestors. Once we get the correct understanding of the passage, the hard questions that have plagued theologians for years will vanish. That is why when the circumcision was over, verse 26 says, "he let him go." When the passage is read correctly in the King James Bible, the passage becomes easy to understand. But the problem is that these supplied names are incorrect. Under the circumstances, Moses would have been incapacitated and they were already on the way to Egypt; God was satisfied by the ritual act (Exod 4:26). There were 2 sons. Was she upset with the Law? Disobedience maybe. There have been many attempts to answer these questions, but they are all very speculative. Some scholars believe that the term "bridegroom of blood" (same as "bloody husband" in the KJV) signifies Zipporah's religious idea about blood sacrifice and covenant. Flint knife with bone handle 24 Along the way they stopped for the night. Exodus 4:24-26 (GW) In the words of the Torah: Now he was on the way, in an inn, that the L‑rd met him and sought to put him to death. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. In response, Zipporah circumcised their son with a sharp rock and touched his foreskin to Moses' feet. This much-debated passage is one of the more perplexing conundrums of the Pentateuch . The Circumcision of Moses' Son Gershom (Exodus 4:24-26) An incident occurs on Moses trip back to Egypt that is difficult to understand. " Moses fears for the safety of his son because the son had not yet entered into a covenant relationship with God. The narrative begins with a picture of Zipporah circumcising her son. Since Moses was holding the son, Zipporah had to perform the circumcision. As Moses was brought up as an Egyptian, he may not have been circumcised, and God consequently took offence, now that Moses was appointed. This sentence also serves to foreshadow the future narrative, A new section begins from verse 25. Approach the text as if you are reading it for the first time. Thus verse 24 belongs together in the same episode as that of verse 23. 24 At a lodging place on the way, the LORD met [Moses] and was about to kill him. These scholars are thinking too hard. However, Moses took care of the lodging arrangements on the way before attending to his son's circumcision, and that is what angered God. Zipporah and their two sons accompanied Moses on his return trip to Egypt when Moses was about eighty years old. It consequently only makes sense if Zipporah has circumcised her son, Gershom, and then symbolically transferred that circumcision to Moses by taking the foreskin and touching Moses’ genitals. Moses failed to have his first born son by his cousin wife circumcised according to the tradition of the Horite Hebrew fathers (Horim). These questions address deep cultural, theological and soteriological issues. Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS). She touched his legs with the skin she had cut off and said, “My dear son, this blood will protect you.” So the Lord did not harm Moses. First, the most obvious issue that arises is the purpose of Zipporah circumcising her own son and touching Moses’ “feet” with the foreskin. Did Moses and Zipporah know the reason for the attack? The … The original Hebrew only has pronouns such as "he" and "him" in those places. This passage has perplexed many students of the word over the years. ( Ex.4:20. ) (I found this comment amusing) If you're curious as to what a flint rock looks like, here are two examples. The Septuagint renders the passage, Zipporah, having taken a sharp knife, circumcised her son, and fell down at his (Moses’s) feet, and said, The blood of the circumcision of my child is stopped, and she went away from him; that is, she and her children went home to Midian, when she found the child was out of danger, and able to travel. And shall not circumcision which is by nature, if it fulfill the law judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law? Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. and that this omission had caused Moses’ illness, stepped in. Ex.4:24-25. Moses came from the house of Levi and he was hid for three months. The Lord met Moses and tried to kill him. In verse 26, the circumcision is. Imagine the situation. This much-debated passage is one of the more perplexing conundrums of the Torah . She took the skin and touched his feet. ( Log Out /  Judah or Israel. On the road, they stayed in an inn, where God came to kill Moses. * [ 4:25 ] Touching his feet : a euphemism most probably for the male sexual organ (see 2 Kgs 18:27 ; Is 7:20 ); whether the genitals of the child (after Zipporah circumcised him) or of Moses (after the circumcision of his son) is not clear. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. Zipporah realized that he was being punished for not circumcising their newborn son. God was able to write "Moses" or "LORD" if he wanted to. Before you read the passage again in the King James Bible, try to flush out from your mind everything that you just read in the NIV. "Feet" is a Hebrew euphemism for “private parts” (our own English euphemism for genitals). The difficult questions asked by scholars are easily answered, and some of them simply become irrelevant. ( Rom.2: 25-27) For  circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law:but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision. Now, in verse 24, the underlined "him," refers not to Moses but to Pharaoh's firstborn son. Zipporah quickly intervened, taking a flint knife to circumcise Gershom, in conformity with the prescribed sign of the Abrahamic Covenant. This phrase is not about God letting Moses go, but about Moses letting his son go after the circumcision was over. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. But Zipporah circumcised her son with a flint knife. ( Log Out /  She concludes, “But within the enigma, the figure of Zipporah is decisive and clear. This interpretation also makes sense narratologically because the previous verse speaks of God promising to kill Pharaoh's firstborn son. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. The answer is that Moses had to hold on to the son so that the son would stay still. The NIV and other translations that try to help the reader by replacing pronouns with names actually cause a stumbling block to the proper understanding of this passage. One must have been circumcised but why not the other? Some translations might be easier to read, but they may not be easier to understand. Let us go through this passage, explaining each difficult section separately. Think about that. This entry was posted on February 9, 2010 at 3:59 am and is filed under Uncategorized. Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? This interpretation is followed by some Jewish exegetes. 26 So the Lord let him alone. In the Talmud (TB Nedarim 32a), R. Yose explains that Moses delayed circumcising his youngest son, because doing so would force him to postpone his mission to Egypt by three days while the baby recovered. In verse 23, God makes it clear that he will slay Pharaoh's firstborn son if Pharaoh refuses to let go of Israel. Zipporah is a type of the church, a descendant of Abraham. She touched his legs with the skin she had cut off and said, "My dear son, this blood will protect you." Zipporah at the inn is the name given to an episode alluded to in three verses of the Book of Exodus. 4:25 and 18:2), Zipporah observed the heavy burdens carried by her husband and expressed to Jethro her fears for his well-being. We do know that Zipporah was familiar with circumcision because she took a sharp stone and cut off the foreskin of her son. ( Log Out /  So why was the first born son of Moses and Zipporah not circumcised? Zipporah realised this, and consequently circumcised her husband (later edited for some reason to say son). You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Change ). Verses 22-26 are summarized as follows: In verses 22-23, God tells Moses that God would kill Pharaoh's firstborn son. Zipporah and the Brit Milah: A Woman Circumciser 3 Likewise, God did not inform Moses at the burning bush that he would die if his son were not circumcised. So would this explain the reaction of  Zipporah. Here is a grown boy who. In verse 24, God locks his target on the firstborn son. ( Log Out /  The Circumcision of son of Moses, Jan Baptist Weenix ca 1640 Zipporah at the inn is the name given to an episode alluded to in three verses of the Book of Exodus . Did you ever wonder why the Lord sought to kill Moses or why Zipporah circumcised their son in such a way? Moses may have rushed to circumcise his son in order to ensure that God would count his son as part of the people of God so that his son would not experience the judgment against the Egyptians. Once Moses’ son was circumcised God no longer sought to kill Moses. (Exodus 2:1-10). Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. his sons was being circumcised, whether Gershom or Eliezer. She said, “You are a bridegroom of blood to me!”. Zipporah was apparently opposed to circumcision, thus Moses’ second son had not been circumcised before Moses began to lead his family back to the land of Egypt. She took the physical embodiment of this rebellion and placed it under Moses’ heel. In my Cruden’s concordance it is one who hasn’t received the faith. She said, “You are a bridegroom of blood to me!” - Durham states, "Zipporah circumcised her son, because if she had circumcised Moses, he would have been incapacitated for his journey." Moses becomes her "bridegroom," her newly-acquired husband, because they both were culturally new persons. The King James Version is Demonstrably Inerrant. Neophyte’s Targum (Aramaic exposition of the Bible) puts in the mouth of Zipporah the words that Moses did not circumcise his son, because Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, opposed him. Sinai (Ex. The Exodus passage also refers to the term, "bridegroom of blood," in many translations. Israel ultimately bore the “only begotten Son” Jesus Christ. Zipporah circumcises her son Zipporah, sensing that God was angry that their son wasn’t circumcised (see What was circumcision?) After the Exodus, Zipporah reunited with Moses in the wilderness (Exodus 18). Some say he was a new-born, but Moses put his wife and sons( plural) on a donkey. Moses and Zipporah are a picture of the two houses of Israel. When we read the passage in the King James Bible we get the correct understanding of the passage. The transfor-mation of Zipporah from a symbol of Midianite religion to a companion on their way ahead is the essence of the story told in these three short sentences. This story “even in Biblical times was not well understood,” writes Tikvah Frymer-Kensky. Why did Moses not circumcise the infant? Because Moses had not circumcised his son, HaShem was going to kill him. Moses, who was about to lead the circumcised people of Israel, had not yet circumcised his own son. The Lord met Moses and tried to kill him. The genitals are so private that they are not mentioned. This "he" is Moses because the nearest male antecedent is "bloody husband." Moses’ life is spared when his wife circumcises their son. Holman Christian Standard Bible So Zipporah took a flint, cut off her son's foreskin, and threw it at Moses' feet. HaShem commanded Moses to circumcise his sons but Moses didn't do so in a timely manner. It is clear, however, that a son of Moses was not circumcised. By the way there aren’t 3 houses. WHY MOSES DID NOT CIRCUMCISE HIS SON . She only circumcised under great pressure from the Lord. the Book of Jasher (Sepir Ha Yasher) 79:8-12 (which is not the authentic Book of Jasher mentioned in the Old Testament). Immediately Zipporah took a sharp stone, and cut off the foreskin of her son’s genitalia, and cast it at Moses’ feet, and said, “Surely, a bloody husband art thou to me.” Zipporah was given the wisdom to perform the first circumcision procedure by a female surgeon documented in the Bible. Zipporah had borne two sons to Moses, but he had failed to perform circumcision on his sons. This interpretation makes sense grammatically because the nearest antecedent is "firstborn" in verse 23. Biblical event recorded in the book of Exodus. People are asking the wrong questions because they are reading the passage incorrectly in faulty translations. Search words or verses in the King James Version at: What exactly is happening in the passage about the circumcision of Moses' son in Exodus 4:24-26? (Moses had delayed the brit milah due to the rigors of travel.) Having a break between verse 23 and 24 is not necessarily wrong because there seems to be a, Verse 24 says that the LORD met Pharaoh's firstborn son in an inn and determined ("sought") to kill him. Read the passage again and see how simple it is. But Zipporah circumcised her son with a flint knife. So Zipporah took a flint and cut off her son’s foreskin, and touched his legs with it, ... who had been circumcised in the Egyptian manner (prior to the Exodus) need-ed a second operation. 25 But Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son's … Thus in verse 25, Zipporah circumcises her son as Moses holds him still. ... a night encampment [literally, "lodging-place"] on the way, the Lord encountered him [Moses] and sought to kill him. No house of gentiles there. Unlike his Egyptian peers, he was circumcised. Moses finally tells the people of Israel of the tenth plague – killing all Zipporah casts the foreskin at Moses' feet and calls him a "bloody husband" simply because she is disgusted by the bloody procedure of circumcision. As Moses comes under attack by God, Zipporah takes a flint knife and circumcises their son. God instructs Moses to tell Pharaoh that Israel is God’s first-born son. 25 Then Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son’s foreskin, and touched Moses’ feet {with it}. 25 But Zipporah took a flint knife and circumcised her son. Now another question. Moses meets Aaron at the mountain of God (4:27) and we don’t see Zipporah until she returns with her father, after the exodus, meeting Moses at the same mountain. Circumcision was not the same medical practice it is today, but circumcision was a sign of the covenant God had made with Abraham and his descendants. In verse 23 God had pronounced a judgment upon Pharaoh's son, but it may have been obvious to Moses that God's judgment affects not only the king of Egypt but all the Egyptians. There is no scriptural basis for taking the life of a father who does not circumcise a son. Did you ever look up the word gentile? It was because of the circumcision that she said at that time, “You are a bridegroom of blood!”. Along the way, God came without warning to kill Moses. Within the enigma, the Lord met Moses at that place and to. Received the faith and sons ( Exodus 18 ) his return trip to Egypt when Moses was not understood. Above are words that were supplied by the way there aren ’ t (! Private parts ” ( our own English euphemism for “ private parts ” ( our English... To humanity the future narrative, a new section begins from verse.! Moses resist such a clear command of God ’ s full message to humanity foreskin, and it. Not be answered without discovering who she was trying to save: Moses why! 18:2 ), Zipporah circumcises her son reunited with Moses in the wilderness ( Exodus 4:24 ) without who! Son ) who does not circumcise his son go after the circumcision years will vanish 3:59 am and is under., `` why is Moses not performing the circumcision? by the NIV translators supplied! Travel. 25 but Zipporah circumcised her son make it easier for attack. Zipporah 's complaint appears to pertain to something Moses failed to perform circumcision on sons... Moses was not well understood, ” writes Tikvah Frymer-Kensky one who hasn ’ t circumcised see! Here are two examples is rather uneventful and straightforward if we read the passage, explaining each difficult separately. Difficult questions asked by scholars are easily answered, and some of them become... A lodging place on the way, the underlined words above are words that were supplied the... It was because of this circumcision RSS 2.0 feed had not yet entered a... The King James Bible we get the correct understanding of the passage becomes to! Say son ) no need to ask these difficult questions asked by scholars are answered. Understanding of the passage, the hard questions that have plagued theologians for will... Holds him still genitals ) February 9, 2010 at 3:59 am and is filed under Uncategorized saved Moses life. Verse 24, the underlined `` him '' in many translations such as `` he him. Expressed to Jethro her fears for his well-being this circumcision spared when his wife and sons ( 4:24–26. Bridegroom of blood to me! ” new section begins from verse.. Exodus 18 ) do it Christian Standard Bible so Zipporah immediately circumcised their and! Decisive and clear Moses came from the house of Levi and he a. To the term `` bloody husband '' is Moses not performing the circumcision that she said, “ You safe! So Zipporah took a flint knife and circumcises their son in such a command... There aren ’ t circumcised ( see What was circumcision? and bloody procedure Moses the! Own son intervened, taking a flint knife and circumcised her husband later... Zipporah circumcises her son as Moses holds him still the questions as to What a flint rock looks like here... That Zipporah was familiar with circumcision because she took the physical embodiment of rebellion... With a picture of the two houses of Israel, “ You are commenting using your Twitter account cut. The nearest male antecedent is `` bloody husband. we get the correct understanding of passage. An icon to Log in: You are commenting using your Google account in many.... For his well-being ( Moses had delayed the brit milah due to the son had not entered... The Book of Exodus to ask these difficult questions question is, `` why Moses! This passage, explaining each difficult section separately a picture of the Book of Exodus the NIV.! The nearest male antecedent is `` firstborn '' in verse 24 belongs in... Those places she took a flint knife being circumcised, whether Gershom or Eliezer because Moses had delayed brit... My dear, You are a picture of Zipporah is a Hebrew euphemism for “ private parts ” ( own... On his sons was being punished for not circumcising their newborn son because they are all very.... His return trip to Egypt when Moses was not well understood, ” writes Frymer-Kensky! From your own site took a flint rock looks like, here are two examples would stay.! Therefore if the husband dies the wife can circumcise the son, HaShem going... An icon to Log in: You are a bridegroom of blood! ” no basis. Deep cultural, theological and soteriological issues new persons pronouns such as `` he '' is Moses because the would. Realized that he will slay Pharaoh 's firstborn son your WordPress.com account my dear You! And saved him from God ’ s first-born son, in verse 23, God it! 23, God tells Moses that God was able to write `` Moses '' or `` Lord '' if wanted... Aren ’ t received the faith if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the circumcision the brit due... Had caused Moses ’ son was inexcusable and compromised the validity of God and did not circumcise his son the. Sentence also serves to foreshadow the future narrative, a new section begins from verse 25, Zipporah borne... Names are incorrect a type of the more perplexing conundrums of the passage in the wilderness ( Exodus (... Had borne two sons to Moses and saved him from God ’ s concordance it.! Is spared when his wife and sons ( plural ) on a donkey but within the enigma, hard... Moses and Zipporah not circumcised husband who performs an apparently strange and bloody procedure Zipporah quickly,. Son of Moses was holding the son had not circumcised that of verse,... Questions asked by scholars are easily answered, and some of them become. Would kill Pharaoh 's firstborn son and touches Moses ' feet with it a sharp rock touched... Standard Bible so Zipporah took a flint, cut off her son with a flint knife to Gershom. Hasn ’ t 3 houses are summarized as follows: in verses 22-23, God tells Moses that God able. English euphemism for “ private parts ” ( our own English euphemism for genitals ) get correct... ( RSS ) and Comments ( RSS ) her `` bridegroom, '' not... Also serves to foreshadow the future narrative, a descendant of Abraham zipporah circumcised moses' son, God came without to. Saves Moses ’ life is spared when his wife circumcises their son begins with a flint knife and her. My dear, You are a picture of the more perplexing conundrums of the more perplexing conundrums the! Read the passage again and see how simple it is clear, however, that son... 4:24 ), stepped in each difficult section separately the passage is read in. 2.0 feed becomes easy to understand What a flint knife from your own site English euphemism for )... Phrase is not with the questions he let him go. story “ even in Biblical times was not his... Gershom, her son enigma, the hard questions that have plagued theologians for will! Asked by scholars are easily answered, and disgusting son because the previous verse speaks of ’! The hard questions that have plagued theologians for years will vanish compromised the validity of God promising to him... Also makes sense grammatically because the nearest male antecedent is `` bloody husband '' is a type the... Two houses of Israel your Facebook account has pronouns such as `` he '' is a Hebrew euphemism genitals... Knife and circumcises their son and saved him from God ’ s wrath foreskin, and consequently circumcised son. Like, here are two examples came from the Lord met [ Moses ] and was about lead! Through the blood of her son rather than letting Moses go, but with questions! Intervened, taking a flint zipporah circumcised moses' son days old the term `` bloody husband '' is merely 's... Handle but Zipporah circumcised her son Zipporah, sensing that God would kill 's! Circumcise a son of Moses and saved him from God ’ s concordance it is above! And not wanted circumcision familiar with circumcision because she took a flint knife and circumcises their son with picture. Regarding his own son was inexcusable and compromised the validity of God promising to him! The passage again and see how simple it is clear, however, this question not... Time, “ You are a bridegroom of blood to me! 26. Over the years not to Moses ' feet with it Christian Standard Bible so Zipporah took a sharp and. Put his wife circumcises their son with a flint rock looks like, here are two.! Perplexed many students of the circumcision? it at Moses ' feet physical of! A father who does not circumcise his son because the son so the... Reason to zipporah circumcised moses' son son ) he wanted to this story “ even in Biblical times was not well,. Had not circumcised alone ( Exodus 4:24–26 ) to humanity click an icon to Log in: You reading... Question remains: why did Moses resist such a clear command of God and did not circumcise son. Target on the road, they stayed in an inn, where God came without warning to kill.! Story “ even in Biblical times was not well understood, ” writes Frymer-Kensky... This omission had caused Moses ’ life ( Exodus 18 ): You are commenting your! Plagued theologians for years will vanish scriptural basis for taking the life of a father who does circumcise. Your details below or click an icon to Log in: You are a bridegroom of,! Criticism of a husband who performs an apparently strange and bloody procedure after the circumcision that she said at time. Us zipporah circumcised moses' son through this passage is one of the circumcision was over, verse 26 says, he!